MKH Annual Report 2020

53 MKH BERHAD PRINCIPLE A: BOARD LEADERSHIP AND EFFECTIVENESS (CONT’D) II. BOARD COMPOSITION (CONT’D) 5. Nomination Committee The Nomination Committee was established on 27 November 2012 and comprises of two (2) members, all of whom are Independent Non-Executive Directors and they are responsible to make independent recommendations for new appointments to the Board. The members of the Nomination Committee and their attendance at the Nomination Committee meeting held during the year under review are as follows: Name Designation Attendance Percentage Haji Mohammed Chudi bin Haji Ghazali Chairman 1/1 100% Datuk Mohammad bin Maidon Member 1/1 100% The summary activities undertaken by the Nomination Committee in the discharge of its duty for the financial year under review are as follows: i) reviewed the Directors who were due for re-election by rotation and/or re-appointment; ii) reviewed the Board’s required mix of skills, current size and composition, experience and other qualities including the core competencies which Independent Non-Executive Directors should bring to the Board; iii) evaluated the independence of the Independent Non-Executive Directors based on the criteria of “Independence” as prescribed in the MMLR and the Corporate Governance Guide issued by Bursa Securities; iv) assessed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Board based on specific criteria such as Board composition and structure, principal responsibilities of the Board, the Board process and Board governance; v) assessed and evaluated the individual Directors’ performance and the effectiveness of the Board as a whole together with the Audit Committees’ performance; vi) identified suitable training programmes for the Directors and Audit Committee; and vii) deliberated on the findings of the assessments and reported the findings to the Board. The terms of reference of the Nomination Committee are available for reference at www.mkhberhad.com . 6. Board and Board Committee Evaluation The Nomination Committee also assesses the effectiveness of the Board as a whole and Audit Committee and the contribution of each individual Director, including Independent Non-Executive Directors on an annual basis. The evaluation process was led by the Nomination Committee’s Chairman and supported by the Company Secretary. The evaluation results were considered by the Nomination Committee, which then made recommendations to the Board with the aim of helping the Board to discharge its duties and responsibilities. The evaluation was based on specific criteria such as Board composition and structure, principal responsibilities of the Board, the Board process and Board governance. Corporate Governance Overview Statement