KENANGA ANNUAL REPORT 2024

KENANGA INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2024 WE ARE KENANGA OUR SUSTAINABILITY APPROACH LEADERSHIP STATEMENT HOW WE ARE GOVERNED SHAREHOLDERS’ INFORMATION NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 DECEMBER 2024 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 DECEMBER 2024 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OUR VALUE CREATION APPROACH 187 186 3. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT’D.) 3.4 Material accounting policy information (cont’d.) (k) Impairment of financial assets (cont’d.) (iv) Forward looking information In their ECL models, the Group and the Bank rely on a broad range of forward looking information as economic inputs, such as: • Gross Domestic Products (“GDP”) growth rate; and • Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (“KLCI”) The inputs and models used for calculating ECLs may not always capture all characteristics of the market at the date of the financial statements. To reflect this, qualitative adjustments or overlays are occasionally made as temporary adjustments when such differences are significantly material. Detailed information about these inputs and multiple-scenario analysis are provided in Note 51(a). (v) Collateral valuation To mitigate its credit risks on financial assets, the Group and the Bank seek to use collateral, where possible. The collateral comes in various forms, such as cash, securities, letters of credit/guarantees, real estate, receivables, inventories, other non-financial assets and credit enhancements such as netting agreements. The Group’s and the Bank’s accounting policy for collateral assigned to it through its lending arrangements is such that collateral, unless repossessed, is not recorded on the Group’s and the Bank’s statement of financial position. However, the fair value of collateral affects the calculation of ECLs. It is generally assessed, at a minimum, at inception and re-assessed on a monthly basis. However, some collateral, for example, cash or securities relating to margining requirements, is valued daily. To the extent possible, the Group and the Bank use active market data for valuing financial assets held as collateral. Other financial assets which do not have readily determinable market values are valued using models. Non-financial collateral, such as real estate, is valued based on data provided by third parties such as real estate valuers, or based on housing price indices. (vi) Collateral repossessed The Group’s and the Bank’s policy are to determine whether a repossessed asset can be best used for its internal operations or should be sold. Assets determined to be useful for the internal operations are transferred to their relevant asset category at the lower of their repossessed value or the carrying value of the original secured asset. Assets for which selling is determined to be a better option are transferred to assets held for sale at their fair value (if financial assets) and fair value less cost to sell for non-financial assets at the repossession date in line with the Group’s and the Bank’s policy. In its normal course of business, the Group and the Bank do not physically repossess properties or other assets in its portfolio, but engages external agents to recover funds, generally at auction, to settle outstanding debt. Any surplus funds are returned to the customers/obligors. As a result of this practice, the properties under legal repossession processes are not recorded on the balance sheet. 3. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT’D.) 3.4 Material accounting policy information (cont’d.) (k) Impairment of financial assets (cont’d.) (vii) Write-offs Financial assets are written off either partially or in their entirety only when the Group and the Bank have stopped pursuing the recovery. If the amount to be written off is greater than the accumulated loss allowance, the difference is first treated as an addition to the allowance that is then applied against the gross carrying amount. Any subsequent recoveries are credited to credit loss expense. (viii) Rescheduled and restructured (“R&R”) loans The Group and the Bank sometimes make concessions or modifications to the original terms of loans as a response to the borrower’s financial difficulties, rather than taking possession or otherwise enforce collection of collateral. The Group and the Bank consider a loan as R&R when such concessions or modifications are provided as a result of the borrower’s present or expected financial difficulties and the Group and the Bank would not have agreed to them if the borrower had been financially healthy. Indicators of financial difficulties include defaults on covenants, or significant concerns. A rescheduling and restructuring of a loan may involve extending the payment arrangements and the agreement of new loan conditions. Once the terms have been renegotiated, any impairment is measured using the original EIR as calculated before the modification of terms. It is the Group’s and the Bank’s policy to monitor impaired R&R loans to help ensure that future payments continue to be likely to occur. Derecognition decisions and classification between Stage 2 and Stage 3 are determined on a case-by-case basis. If these procedures identify a loss in relation to a loan, it is disclosed and managed as an impaired Stage 3 (credit-impaired) asset until it is collected or written off. When the loan has been renegotiated or modified but not derecognised, the Group and the Bank also reassess whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk, as set out in Note 51(a). Where a credit-impaired loan has been classified as R&R, the loan will continue to be classified as impaired until repayments based on the rescheduled or restructured terms have been observed continuously for a period of 6 months. (l) Impairment of non-financial assets The Group and the Bank assess at each reporting date whether there is an indication that an asset may be impaired. If any indication exists, or when annual impairment assessment for an asset is required, the Group and the Bank make an estimate of the asset’s recoverable amount. An asset’s recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s or cash-generating unit’s (“CGU”) fair value less costs to sell and its value-in-use. For the purpose of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. Where the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is written down to its recoverable amount. Impairment losses recognised in respect of a CGU or groups of CGUs are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to those units or groups of units and then, to reduce the carrying amount of the other assets in the unit or groups of units on a pro-rata basis.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDgzMzc=