MISC Annual Report 2018

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR OUR BUSINESS OUR LEADERSHIP OUR PERFORMANCE OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY OUR GOVERNANCE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OTHER INFORMATION 50 TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 239 MISC BERHAD ANNUAL REPORT 2018 238 2 . SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT'D.) 2.3 Summary of significant accounting policies (cont'd.) (j) Offsetting of financial instruments Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the consolidated statement of financial position if, and only if, there is a currently enforceable legal right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or to realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously. (k) Impairment of financial assets Before 1 January 2018, the Group and the Corporation recognise loss allowances for financial assets in accordance with MFRS 139: Financial Instruments. The details of the accounting policy of MFRS 139 in relation to impairment of financial assets is disclosed in Note 2.3 (z). The Group and the Corporation recognise loss allowances for expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortised cost, debt investments measured at FVOCI, contract assets and finance lease receivables. The Group and the Corporation measure loss allowances on debt securities at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit loss, except for debt securities that are determined to have low credit risk at the reporting date, other debt securities for which credit risk has not increased significantly since initial recognition and finance lease receivables, which are measured as 12 month expected credit loss. Loss allowances for trade receivables and contract assets (amount due from customers on contracts) are always measured at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit loss. When determining whether the credit risk of a financial asset has increased significantly since initial recognition and when estimating expected credit loss, the Group and the Corporation consider reasonable and supportable information that is relevant and available without undue cost or effort. This includes both quantitative and qualitative information and analysis, based on the Group’s historical experience, informed credit assessment and forward-looking information. The Group and the Corporation assume that the credit risk on a financial asset has increased significantly if it is past due. The Group and the Corporation consider a financial asset to be in default when the borrower is unlikely to pay its credit obligations to the Group and the Corporation in full, without recourse by the Group and the Corporation to take actions such as realising security. Lifetime expected credit losses are the expected credit losses that result from all possible default events over the expected life of a financial instrument, while 12 months expected credit losses are the portion of expected credit losses that result from default events that are possible within the 12 months after the reporting date. Expected credit losses are measured as a function of probability of default and loss given default. Probability of default is the likelihood of default over a particular time horizon and is derived using external credit ratings, if they are available, or internal credit ratings based on quantitative or qualitative information for the counterparty. Loss given default is the assumption of the proportion of financial asset that cannot be recovered by conversion of collateral to cash or by legal process, and is assessed based on the Group and the Corporation's historical experience. An impairment loss in respect of financial assets measured at amortised cost is recognised in profit or loss and the carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account. 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONT'D.) 2.3 Summary of significant accounting policies (cont'd.) (k) Impairment of financial assets (cont'd.) Information about the exposure to credit risk and ECLs for financial assets as at 31 December 2018 is disclosed in Note 22 and Note 38. (l) Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting The Group uses derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and currency hedge to hedge its interest rate risk and foreign currency risk. Such derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value on the date on which a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at fair value at each reporting date. Derivatives are carried as financial assets when the fair value is positive and as financial liabilities when the fair value is negative. Any gains or losses arising from changes in fair value on derivatives during the year that do not qualify for hedge accounting and the ineffective portion of an effective hedge are recognised in the income statement. For the purpose of hedge accounting, hedges are classified as: - fair value hedges when hedging the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognised asset or liability or an unrecognised firm commitment (except for foreign currency risk); - cash flow hedges when hedging the exposure to variability in cash flows that is either attributable to: • a particular risk associated with a recognised asset; or • liability or a highly probable forecast transaction; or • the foreign currency risk in an unrecognised firm commitment. - hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation. At the inception of a hedge relationship, the Group formally designates and documents the hedge relationship to which the Group wishes to apply hedge accounting, the risk management objective of the hedge and strategy for undertaking the hedge. The documentation includes identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged and how the Group will assess whether the hedging relationship meets the hedge effectiveness requirements (including the analysis of sources of hedge ineffectiveness and how the hedge ratio is determined). A hedging relationship qualifies for hedge accounting if it meets all of the following effectiveness requirements: • There is an economic relationship between the hedged item and the hedging instruments. • The effect of credit risk does not ‘dominate the value changes’ that result from that economic relationship. • The hedge ratio of the hedging relationship is the same as that resulting from the quantity of the hedged item that the Group actually hedges and the quantity of the hedging instrument that the Group actually uses to hedge that quantity of hedged item.